Neo Westphalian Europe Part 2: Western Europe

The Western European break up will follow some classic fault lines. The British Isles is already going through a decentralisation process, with their devolution to various historical nations within the Isles. The full-blown disintegration, which the political crisis of Brexit has triggered, is now going to accelerate radically in the coming months. Especially if the party which wins the upcoming election in the UK is not able to cut a new deal, with the Bankers of the City of London, and ruthless Austerity continues to attempt to recapitalise a completely bankrupt banking sector. This process of disintegration will also be accelerated as the housing crisis escalates into full-scale collapse.

Across the channel the Jacobin centralisation of the Fifth French Republic will lose its grip on many peripheral regions, as it too succumbs to the forces of decentralisation. However it is likely to gain new territories as well, as its borders change. The Belgian region of Wallonia is likely to enter into union with Paris due to its shared culture. This will reform national boundaries in the surrounding areas.

Currently the strongest of the independence movements in the region is the Scottish Nationalist movement.

Go To Part 3

Neo Westphalian Europe

As we progress deeper into the crisis gripping the Western Empire, we are witnessing some very curious political trends. We continue to see the accelerating break down of centralised power structures, as the economic maelstrom reaches its denouement.

Strangely many, who are on the self-proclaimed ‘left’, do not see the irony in the fact that ALL sides of politics are now espousing a form of Nationalism in order to address the crisis. This of course makes sense, as the only way one can have a smaller body politic, than the global empire, is to restore smaller national units. It is also probably because as the cohesion of the national state has been destroyed, over the past 40 years of Globalisation, we have seen an interesting reversion back to forms of identity politics, in order to try and restore some coherent sense of belonging for the populations atomised into the disconnected global mall, monoculture, which the global Empire pushed. 

For some this took the form of seeking to align ones politics around what race or gender they were, in order to try and fulfil the tribal imperative common to all humans. This approach however has tended to completely balkanise societies and leave them in political paralysis. So it is no surprise that many are now once again turning to the ideas of 19th Century nation building, which created more cohesive units of populations often organised around a similar language grouping or a shared historical mythos. This is the dynamic that will continue to accelerate the coming secession wave as we forge deeper into the new century.

We have already done an in depth post on how this break up will look on the North American continent. Indeed many of the predictions made in that post have subsequently come to pass, as the secession movements across the US rise to a level not seen since the Civil War. Intriguingly this rise in secession movements is now currently on the LEFT. Although many of the ones that rose on the right, during the Obama administration, have maintained their forward momentum. 

Even more intriguing is the great irony of the "Globalised" nationalist movement, which has sprung up on the political right. This is a movement that has grown in the world wide, borderless, global internet domain of cyberspace. Yet it is calling for a restoration of the right to sovereignty for nation states. It makes this claim through pushing the meme of the spoof nationstate known as Kekistan. This fake nation even has its own flag which is taken to pro Nationalism rallies. So far there has been no move to give this memetic experiment its own central bank, with it's own powers to produce a currency for itself. This is of course the path to TRUE sovereign independence.

This is the most curious aspect of the push back against Globalisation of all. Even as the globalising forces of the internet rise, they are helping fuel this return to tribalism and nationalism. It would seem these are very deep forces of human nature that should be embraced and not fought against. 

No one on the Globalist left seems to see the great irony however that in their rejection of what they see as a ‘horrid and backward return to US nationalism’, which their President Trump represents, they are in fact embracing Californian or Cascadian or any number of other NATIONALIST movements.

Why the left cannot see this cognitive dissonance in its current discourse is hard to say. Possibly it is the extreme propaganda of the imperialists, which is so confusing many who claim to be of the ‘left’. The mainstream, imperial ‘left’s’ leadership currently argues that anyone asking to have a restoration of sovereignty, for the local body politic and anyone who wants the inviolability of national boundaries to be recognised, are somehow some sort of extremist racists who are literally getting ready to open up the gas chambers again.

Then these very same ‘leaders’ turn around in the same breath and howl and wail about some manic theory, that the whole of western civilisation is under attack, as it’s national sovereignty is subverted and the inviolability of its national borders are ignored by 30 foot tall Russian Godzilla’s. This is apparently, according to their narrative, an outrageous betrayal of international laws and norms. 

It is obvious you cannot hold both these positions simultaneously, either we live in a world of national sovereignty or we don’t. The average prole either realises the scam behind this rhetoric, or is left so confused by this cognitive dissonance that these ‘leaders’ continue to lose their ground and control over their populations. As a result Nationalism is now on the rise, in one form or another, on BOTH sides of the body politic. Globalisation is dying on the tree of its negative interest rate policy and extremist currency wars and resource extraction wars against the peasant class of planet Earth.

No more clear is this cognitive dissonance, on the ideas of nationalism, than across the Atlantic. In Scotland many continue to rail against the fact that Nationalists succeeded in restoring the Sovereignty of the United Kingdom’s national body politic, from the supra national EU. Their solution to what they see as a dreadful mistake is to call for even MORE Nationalism, as they push for a second Scottish independence vote.  This would restore the sovereignty of the Scottish body politic in Holyrood, from under the foot of Westminster. However they then make a great leap of ideological gymnastics, when they claim they would cede this newfound sovereignty BACK to the unelected Aristocracy in Brussels.

It is not clear if maybe the SNP is aware that this is actually just a bluff and they have no intent of restoring themselves to an EU that may not even exist by the time Scotland is independent. This may indeed just be rhetoric, used to convince the populace to finally do the sensible thing and end the Union with England.

The continued existence of the EU is in more doubt than ever. This is despite the current propaganda coup Brussels got from the latest French election. The corporate media tries to sell the idea that the recent French election is a win for the coming United States of Europe and that in fact the Centralists are about to win the final coup de grace, in the epic war we find ourselves in. However this is highly unlikely.

Despite the propaganda, a majority did not elect Macron. Huge amounts of people abstained from the process. His election was only due to the fact that the Nationalists in France could only put forward individuals who genuinely had links to Fascist organisations of old. Unlike all the hysteria that tried to tie the Trump campaign to Fascists in America, when this was clearly not the case, the Vichy links of the Le Pens were very real historical facts.

Ultimately this election has just delayed the implosion of the EU and probably made sure that it is going to be a very bloody disintegration indeed. So much for the great propaganda nonsense the EU likes to spin that they alone stand in the way of new warfare on the continent. Everything about the project is now pushing Europe to an inevitable outbreak of its semi regular revolutionary waves.

Already Macron faces a low level insurrection from the far left on the streets of the major cities. No doubt in rural areas there are many angry supporters of the National Front who are also biding their time. When Macron finally announces that he will be strip mining the French pensions, to feed the out of control juggernaut that are the German banks in Frankfurt, the very serious conflict will erupt. We will probably see the labour unions joining the left in the cities at that point, for a new Paris Commune and National Front militants will take the regional areas. Indeed the likely hood of full-scale civil war will, at that point, be at an all time high. In much the same way as we are currently seeing the United States union fast approaching a violent break up.

In the aftermath of this conflict and the end of the European Union we will probably see a Europe with a number of organisational changes. As well as the European Union finally being swept into the dustbin of history, alongside all the other futile attempts to restore the Roman Empire, we will probably see the great centralised states of France, Italy, Germany and Poland shattered as well.

The forces of industrialisation that gave us those central states will have been shattered by the current forces of financialisation and the decentralist milieu of the internet age.  For the next few posts then we will have a look at what this new Europe will look like, much as we did for the US last year. 

On then to the other side of the pond for a new political organising of the continent.

Go To Next Part

Go Back To Part 1

Go Back To Redux

Global AntiFa VS American AntiFa

We are currently witnessing a complete realignment of the Geopolitical fold. It seems that finally many are seeing that Communism is far less of a threat to the world than Fascism. Ironically this is a statement that was just also made by the Trump administration at Davos when Scaramucci overturned the past 50 years of NATO doctrine in an astonishing statement to the same effect. Indeed here we can truly see the depth of insanity that the lack of context the Fake Stream Media ever puts on anything has got us.

When one examines the past fifteen years of history one reaches a startling conclusion. The Democrats under the Obama administration actually continued a policy of supporting the Fascist Internationale around the world. This was carrying on with a policy that was also pursued by the Neocon Republican faction so there is cross party guilt in this. They basically continued to support and assist the World Anti Communist League in its destruction and suppression of the Global Left.

They did this via the FI's proxies in Saudi and Qatari Salafasicsts (and their associated branches in AfPak), Gulenites in Turkey, Ukrainian Werwolf divisions and numerous other actors of the Fascist right around the globe. Hysterically, even as he used these forces to topple left wing governments around the world, at a rate that would have made even Reagan and Thatcher jealous, he was somehow accused of being a closet Marxist back on the home front. When he was clearly anything BUT that.

Things get even more crazy when one considers the new administration. If we recall a few years ago, in Syria, Kerry and Obama had all but called it that we would not save Kobane and would let the town get taken as part of the push to turn Syria over to the Fascists. Yet suddenly there was some sort of rebellion in the Pentagon and a faction of it went rogue. This was somewhat of a continuation of the infamous "We will not be Al Qaida's Air Force" rebellion. This faction then doubled down and started openly supporting the Kurds around Kobane. This help went from arming and training and air cover all the way up to the creation of the current divisions known as the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). By and large the SDF is primarily made up of the YPG.

This means in essence that this faction of the Pentagon was openly supporting groups who are Anarcho-Marxist in their ideology. This was a massive reversal of the past 50 years of policy where the CIA had tried to use Turkish Grey Wolves or Saudi Salafascists to suppress and destroy these groups. Looking back at it, it now seems that this faction was getting its main guidance from Michael Flynn who was the head of the DIA at the time. Indeed it was this insubordination that probably saw Obama eventually purge him. So how interesting then that Trump brought him back on as National Security advisor until his fall a few days ago. Since the Trump administration came to power it has openly offered even more support to these groups. This essentially means that Trump is in support of Marxists on the ground inside north Syria.

It gets even stranger if we are to view the world through the eyes of an average Democrat Hillbot Lunatic. They tell us daily in their hysteria that Trump is in fact a Russian plant. This may be a highly dubious assertion but for the moment lets assume that it is true for arguments sake. This means that the Trump administration is therefore also supporting Marxists in the form of the Ba'ath Government in Syria.

This would also mean that Trump was in support of the International Brigades who until recently were defending Novorossiya against the Ukrainian invasion. A massive part of this AntiFa battalion was made up of open European Communists.



With all this in mind therefore it is mind blowing to see kids waving AntiFa flags, claiming allegiance to the Communist Party of America, burning down Universities in defiance of the first US administration in almost 50 years to actually offer support to left wing guerillas around the world in the form of men, materiel, arms and even air power!! It's a complete lunatic asylum. Hollywood could not have come up with a script of this if they tried.

 Far from being the "new Hitler" it seems Trump is in fact the Americans Gorbachev. Hated at home but seen abroad as the pragmatist who is winding down the Empire as it collapses. It seems a new alignment is forming in the global Geopolitical spread. An alliance of the Left with the classical Republican against the common foe of the Fascist. Indeed we saw this exact orientation during the Spanish Civil War.

Then Socialists, Communists, Anarchists and Republicans fought side by side against the Fascist hordes. The infamous Abraham Lincoln Brigades rubbed shoulders even with Stalinists on the barricades of Spain. Indeed this was an alliance that would carry on into World War Two itself, eventually, when the final alliance between the Soviets and the West formed to crush Italy and Germany.



Maybe back then a more recent history was fresher in everyone's mind. The Bolshevik purges of their aristocratic class, during the Communist revolutions, were really not so different from the similar purges that the French and Americans had conducted during their Republican revolutions of a 100 years earlier. Without the 50 years of Cold War propaganda and hysteria that twisted our vision of this history maybe we would have remembered this fact quicker in modern times. Indeed the irony being a large part of this propaganda was foisted on the West by the defeated members of the Nazi party, who were reabsorbed by the Americas during Operation PaperClip and the dastardly work of the Gehlen Organisation.

Now under Trump, whose local population all screams Fascist about when they see him, we are seeing the true stirrings of a new, global, anti-fascist movement. If the Hillary Clinton camp is to be believed then the Trump administration is in support of Marxists on the ground inside Rojava, inside the Donbass and inside Damascus. Who knows how much further this support of the Global Left will spread. The irony is that in his mission to destroy the Salafascists he will be undoing all the work the World Anti Communist League put in creating this monster over the past 50 years.

Making America Great Again!!

As the American Empire careens towards it inevitable, explosive end, it seems that the phenomena of Pan Secessionism is accelerating greatly. We are currently seeing the European theatre of the empire completely crumble, even as the European "Union" tries desperately to ever expand itself.

The upcoming Brexit could be the beginning of a complete unwinding of many of the centralised political structures on the continent. Not only the Union but even some of the centralised nation states face break away regions in the aftermath.

Many new, smaller, states will likely exist in the aftermath of this collapse. Whilst the mainstream media is avidly following this disintegration and implosion in Europe little attention is being given to the North American continent. It too stands to undergo an equally radical transformation of its map, in the wake of the vacuum of the empire.

This fact is treated with incredulity by many, for some bizarre reason. It should be no surprise that territorial disintegration follows the collapse of Empire. We saw this very recently in world history with the disintegration of the former Soviet Union. Our own cultural history should inform of this too, with the disintegration of the British Empire.

The current election cycle in the US shows that the crisis which has manifested in the empire is metastasising into its end point. Therefore, collapse of the empire can be expected now.

In preparation for this we will spend the next few weeks on TDA doing some hypothetical posts, wargaming what the coming map and political make up of the North American continent will most probably look like, in the coming few years. This probability is at an all time high, regardless of who wins the Presidency in the US.

A look at some of the moves on the continent, which will probably occur, can offer us an interesting opportunity to run some thought experiments on the coming geopolitical changes.

It may also give opportunity for members of some of the numerous secession movements that will be covered in these posts to consider there next moves. Here then, for the first post, are the maps which we will be using for our scenarios.

Go Back To Part 1

Go Back To Redux

SECESSION WAVE 2014: DEATH TO THE EMPIRE

           QUEBEC

    VERMONT REPUBLIC

 REPUBLIC OF LAKOTAH

            CASCADIA

            NEVADA

             TEXAS

               ALBA

       CATALAN REPUBLIC

         BASQUE REPUBLIC

              VENETO

        SAKHA REPUBLIC

           NOVOROSSIYA

                 AZAWAD

             KURDISTAN

Legatus Pro Praetore Cosgrove

As Australia enters into the second decade of the 21st century it, like most other places on the planet, seems to be slipping back at an accelerating rate towards a new dark age. It would appear that the forces of some sort of Counter Reformation, or counter Enlightenment movement, are waging total war against the nations of the planet. Here in Australia this is evidenced nowhere more clearly, than in the selection of our new representative who speaks, on our behalf, to our head of state. 

This appointment raises all the classic soul searching, which has long plagued the Australian nation, about its concept of sovereignty. There is already a deeply divisive argument on this point anyway in the land, due to the attempted, forced removal of the sovereignty of the original inhabitants, at the beginning of the new “nations” existence. Even without this argument considered however, the Australian experience with sovereignty has been one of the least capable, for a supposed modern nation, on the planet today.

These usual arguments and questions are compounded even more, by the shocking nature of this new appointee. The new Governor-General of the nation is none other than General Peter Cosgrove. Instantly this throws up the connotations of Australia as little more than a militarily occupied vassal state of a foreign power. This indeed is basically what it is. However to restore the imagery, of a Military Governor controlling the outer colonies, is surely one that would be distasteful to many. Indeed one can argue that this scenario also begins to allow a dangerous creep away from the central Enlightenment tenant of; Civilian Control of the Military. Although of course the argument that he merely represents the ‘civilian’ Queen, who is the true controller, can be offered as a counter. 

This has not been the first time in modern history that such an unpleasant choice has been made. When we last had an openly neo-fascist body politic in power, during the Howard years, the same choice was made with a Major General holding the position. It would seem the Abbott fruit does not fall far from the tree. What makes this current appointment, of a military man to the position, even more distasteful however is that this is not merely some career soldier who has worked his way to the top spot. This man has very recently been involved in direct military conflict. He was the Chief of Defence who oversaw Australia’s involvement in the war with Iraq.

As this was quite clearly a highly illegal conflict, from any sort of international law norms, this therefore makes any leadership who were involved in this operation potential War Criminals, who could still at some point be called on to stand for trial, in international courts, for these crimes. One wonders at the audacity of openly appointing War Criminals to head the nation, whilst at the same time continuously bleating about other countries ‘stained’ human rights records. 

The legal arguments aside, if we just take the Iraq conflict on face value, it has been one of the most spectacular failures that the Australian army has ever been involved in. Ostensibly we were involved in a coalition invasion to project our force and ensure our nations safety from the supposedly mortal enemies of our way of life, Al Q. Instead we set in chain a series of events, whereby we destroyed a regime and an army that were sworn enemies of Al Q and who ensured their total suppression in the region. By doing this we paved the way for a power vacuum that allowed thousands and thousands of these self same, sworn enemies, to flood into the country, until they eventually became the main power bloc of the eastern provinces and their flag flies above many cities today. 

This was, at best, gross negligence and an act by the Australian army that drastically endangered Australian security. One would have thought leadership involved in such a blunder would have been punished, or at least censured. The idea that they would receive PROMOTIONS for this outrage boggles the mind. At worst, this was the Australian army engaging in a direct NATO plot to spread Al CIAda throughout the region, as a series of irregular militias, to ensure the entire region was plunged into permanent internecine warfare and that a complete destabilisation of the area could ensue, to provide better conditions for rampant resource extraction. Subsequent events in Syria would suggest this indeed was the case and therefore the promotion then makes sense. However from a citizen’s point of view, if this is the case, then this is one of the most highly treasonous acts, perpetrated against Australia, in hundreds of years and again warrants Mr Cosgrove standing in some sort of punitive trial and not receiving the top job of the land.

As well as blurring the lines of the Enlightenment concepts, of the separation of the military and civilian arms of the state, the secular concepts, which were so hard fought for, are also brought into question by this appointment. The idea of the separation of Church and State is a highly flawed and struggling one, at the best of times, in the realms of the Commonwealth. Despite John Locke’s best efforts and some greater successes on the continent, the fact that the Sovereign head of state, of the United Kingdom, is in fact also the religiously recognised head, of the Church of England, surely calls this whole concept into question from the get go. This is made even murkier, by the presence of Anglican bishops holding seats in the House of Lords!!

The gross irony of all this of course, is laid bare when one considers that, in the “Western” realms, we are told almost daily that we must launch a holy and apocalyptic war against the Iranians and genocide every last Persian off the face of the planet because they are an evil Theocracy, that has an unelected Executive branch and are therefore a, *gasp*, DICTATORSHIP!!! So it would seem is the United Kingdom and every nation of the Stolenwealth, which has yet to manage to free itself from its imperial yoke. One wonders why the Murdoch rags never call for the wholesale carpet bombing of the United Kingdom, to liberate Earth from yet more of these ‘fundies’. Who knows, maybe enough hacking inquiries may motivate the old reprobate yet!!

I digress, back to our current Governor-Generals issues. Again, under the jack boot of the Howard years, we had a gross blurring of this separation of powers when an Anglican bishop was made one of our Governor-Generals. I guess this kept our experience in line with the state of affairs in London. Of course that ended in unmitigated scandal. Now, with our new Governor-General, we also run into these problems, as he is a current holder of a Knighthood of the Pontifical Equestrian Order of St Gregory the Great.

This again can be taken as a problem from several angles. Of course, in a secular state, the positions of any branches of the Government are, by definition, open to any members of any faith. So if it happened that our Governor-General just happens to be a Roman Catholic, who holds a Knighthood in the Catholic faith, that would be between him and his faith and should have no bearing on how he executes his office. However, in the current climate we can not just let this slide. Currently there is a royal commission being heard into misdeeds of this very same faith. Thus the possibility of a conflict of interest at this point in time drastically increases. 

Whilst it may be argued that it would be very hard for a Governor-General to intervene in an already convened commission, it does bear some thought that we now have a Jesuit trained Prime Minister in charge of one branch of the government, who no doubt still bears much loyalty to the current Jesuit Pope, who has a Cardinal from our lands on HIS board of inquiry into the same affair. Now we also have a holder of a Papal order being appointed to the head of a second branch of the Government, at the same time. It does bear some cautious scrutiny.

This should definitely raise questions, in this context, when one considers the Governor-Generals current Knighthood is also held by the likes of Jimmy Savile. Now of course an entire order can not be held responsible for the actions of individual members within it, however it is odd that this Knightly order has yet to strike him from the rolls and various letters of petition to have him annulled from the order are being written back and forward. One would have thought that would have just been a first port of call, when the revelations about him came out. Again, when one considers this against a backdrop of a commission ACTIVELY accusing many of these orders of a CULTURE of this activity, it does bear some scrutiny. As mentioned before we have already lost another Governor-General over similar issues.

However, there is an even deeper argument, which I think arises from this Knight holding this office, which is one that is always completely overlooked in the modern era. This is the fact that these Papal Equestrian Knighthoods, are not handed out from a Pope as a spiritual leader, of a particular faith, to members of his flock, for their work within the faith. All the Papal Knighthoods are, in fact, handed out by the Pope in his capacity as the temporal monarch of the Holy See. They are given to individuals who are “gentlemen of proven loyalty to the Holy See who, by reason of their nobility of birth and the renown of their deeds or the degree of their munificence, are deemed worthy to be honoured by a public expression of esteem on the part of the Holy See”. Therefore, they are being given out by a SOVEREIGN NATION STATE, the remnant body of the PAPAL STATES, for loyalty to the states and to the Pope as a sovereign world leader.

This brings into play a massive conflict of interest. How can one have, as ones head of state, someone who has clearly sworn allegiance to another world leader and nation? Of course this brings us into the question of why, as Australia, we have a Sovereign of another nation as our head of state to begin with. But after the years of Protestant and Catholic conflicts across the continent, to resolve the questions of where true authority lies in the European experience, one would think these questions had been answered. Does it lie with the body politics of peoples of various lands, or with the Pope as the supreme Emperor (or at least King MAKER) of the continent? Clearly this argument is rearing its ugly head again, as we move into a 21^st century that resembles the 12^th with each passing day.

  

As we can see with the United Kingdom experience a détente, after years of conflict between the Protestant and Catholic realms, has seen many of these “Protestant” monarchs, once more recognise the supreme authority of the Pope. We can see this in the current reunification, of the various Catholic and Protestant orders, of the Knights of Malta. Of course the Queen of England being a Knight of Malta, leaves the Anglicans and the Papists once more happily on the same page and the City of London, the intriguing outpost of Templar, Vatican, power which never left the isles, cements this marriage. So on that level, it would seem, that there is no conflict of interest for a Papist to hold a position, which swears fealty to the Anglican Monarch of the Stolenwealth. However, for anyone who hopes to one day see Australia as a fully sovereign, independent republic, of its people, for its people and by its people, these are all highly concerning issues that must be tackled.

In some ways this appointment is actually opportune, as it defines most clearly the total destruction, of what little sovereignty Australia ever had, in a neat, single, package. No longer a problem vexing just the original inhabitants, whose grievances about sovereignty are largely unresolved, the subsequent waves of immigrants to this land, have now also been comprehensively fleeced of any local sovereignty at all. Instead we are left with a triple layer of sovereignty extraction taking place.

First and foremost, of course, is our loss of sovereignty to the United Kingdom. We still claim an unelected, hereditary, monarch as our head of state. It is ridiculous to suggest that she is just a ‘figure head’, as she is still a massively wealthy individual, who can no doubt hold clout on the markets of the world, not to mention she has shown time and again she still has real power. She sacked an entire, elected, Legislative branch, famously in Australia once. The question must also still be asked when her representative Governor-General, in Canada, deployed troops to Afghanistan without a majority of the Legislative there being aware, what phone calls would have had to be made first before that little trick could be authorised? Of course it is ridiculous to suppose that as the Executive branch of Government she sits around completely powerless. She would have been long gone by now, out of a great many parts of the world and indeed parts of the UK itself, if she was just some ‘tourist attraction’. 

If nothing else, so many oaths are sworn in her name, she could very readily call on any number of factions of orders to do her bidding, should she want. So this leaves Australia in the ridiculous situation whereby, in the 21^st Century, our nation is not ruled by the concept of meritocracy but by a hereditary blood line, based on the luck of birth. The fact that these Monarchs we swear fealty too also happen to be German and aren’t actually even British, makes the whole scam even more ridiculous.

The second layer of sovereignty is then stripped from us by the “Crown Corporation”. The odd and autonomous domain, of the City of London, has gone through varying degrees of strengths over the years. From its heyday as Roman capital of Britain, Londinium, through to its restored glory days as the Templar outpost in the isles, it has always tied Britain to its German/Latin, Roman Empire, connections. In the aftermath of the GFC, it suddenly was thrust startlingly back into the light and we realised quite how much power it wields over institutions across the Stolenwealth. As more and more people feel the disempowering squeeze of the so called Corporatist renaissance, it has become clear that one of the grand daddies of this concept is still a major player here.

Lastly, it would seem that some wave of neo ultramontanism has swept the globe very, very, quietly. We now see the curious situation of Jesuits, SMOM, the Papal Knights and other Counter Reformationist factions, gaining positions of power across the western world. Even here, in the outer fringes of the Stolenwealth, it would seem to be the case. What this movement is trying to achieve seems to be nothing less than the so called New World Order, or more correctly a restoration of the “glory days” of the Holy Roman Empire, as they see them.

The history making power struggles, inside the Vatican itself, seem to lay this bare more frequently. So too, do the numerous documents that come to light, produced by the various think tanks driving this push, like the Club of Rome and the Bilderberg Group. We also note the curious phenomenon of more and more individuals, in positions of power, eagerly snapping up these Knighthoods, dished out by the Pope, as if we were once more in the 12^th century and it was the heyday of the crusades. Given our behaviour in the Middle East and Eastern Europe of late, it would indeed appear that many do actually believe this to be the case.

All three of these scenarios are then enshrined into a law that usurps any hope of a local, ‘law of the land’, or natural law, through the endless signing of the so called “Globalisation” treaties. The most modern of these treaties, that many can see this total assault on our sovereignty quite clearly in, is of course the TPPA.

So herein lies the great challenge facing Australia and most nations on the planet, currently, it would seem. How to restore Sovereignty to this land or lands, what shape that sovereignty will take and how it will be distributed amongst the many sovereign individuals of these lands!

Many may be concerned currently with our present Prime Minister but remember he was an elected individual. I think we should be better spent, in the next few years, keeping an eagle eye on this troublesome new Governor-General of ours, as we forge ahead to answer these deeper, vexing, questions as to where our sovereignty truly lies.