Is Former Kingfisher County Judge Susie Pritchett Of Tulsa, Oklahoma, A Goatsucking Whorebot?

DISCLAIMER FOR NEW READERS:

Apparently Allegedly Ferretous has taken to referring to certain players in the current geopolitical theatre as being the children of mothers who are "goatsucking whores." I would like to take this opportunity to disagree with Ferretous and to state, in this highly public forum, that certain players in the current geopolitical theatre are not the children of mothers who are "goatsucking whores" but are themselves, in fact, "goatsucking whorebots" and I trust we can all see the important difference here. I would further like to take this opportunity to say: come on, whores are people too, you know? So let's not pick on whores, OK? And finally, if you are reading this article now because you googled "goatsucking whores" or "goatsucking whorebots" or "former Kingfisher County Judge Susie Pritchett Of Tulsa, Oklahoma" I would like to take this opportunity to say: welcome to Total Disinformation Awareness, you filthy disgusting pervert you. Of course I'm kidding, y'all bitches can google whatever you fucking want and there's nothing I can ever do to change that. That's what democracy means, dig it?

[Ferretous says: the drunken monkey lawyers have told me to point out that I was not in fact calling anyone a goat sucking whore but merely pointed out that it could well be the case and that no-one here has any evidence that it is not the case]

[SockRatEz says: so calling someone a whore is offensive to whores but calling someone a whorebot is not offensive to our sex robot sisters?]

[sparx says: well, that's a damn good call, SockRatEz, and it's so sensitive and enlightened of you to think about the fuckbots and their simulated feelings. So how about this, if any fuckbots are reading this AND feel offended AND leave a comment saying why they feel offended, I'll start issuing official apologies on a case by case basis. In fact, I suspect that issuing official apologies is about to become an ongoing theme on this blog. [#whatpoliticallycorrectcesspoolhaveiwadedintohere...?]]

[Tony Abbot (allegedly) says: Tony's Rule#1 - NEVER apologise ...]

[SockRatEz says: funnily enough Tony ... for once I agree!]

INTRODUCTION: A Moment Of Realisation [Or: Is Former Kingfisher County Judge Susie Pritchett Of Tulsa, Oklahoma, A Goatsucking Whorebot?]

Have you ever wondered if maybe former Kingfisher County Judge Susie Pritchett of Tulsa, Oklahoma is a goatsucking whorebot? I often have. Which is not to say that while writing this article I wasn't drawn into many long, awkward and painful debates with myself about democracy and the rule of law. I was. Specifically, I was drawn into many long, awkward and painful debates with myself about democracy and the rule of law and how it is applied in Kingfisher County, Tulsa, Oklahoma, by the United States government, via it's not inconsiderable manipulation of language. I would now like to engage in a long, awkward and painful debate about democracy and the rule of law and how it is applied in Kingfisher County, Tulsa, Oklahoma, by the United States government, via it's not inconsiderable manipulation of language, with reference to the writings of Walter Benjamin's Critique Of Violence and Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea's The Illuminatus! Trilogy and I would like to state for the record that yes, former Kingfisher County Judge Susie Pritchett of Tulsa, Oklahoma is a goatsucking whorebot.

PART I: Democracy [Or: An Unfolding OF Miscalculations]

I would like to share some thoughts on democracy and the rule of law and the manipulation of language, with reference to Walter Benjamin's Critique of Violence. But first, in what I'm sure you will recognise as a shocking insight into the minds of our readers, it has recently occurred to me that many of you may be disinclined to share my thoughts on democracy and the rule of law and the manipulation of language [and, in fact, may not even read my thoughts on democracy and the rule of law and the manipulation of language at all and just skip to the bits about goatsucking whores] merely because you not have read Walter Benjamin's Critique of Violence.

And yet pish posh to that, I say. PISH POSH! Look what I've done for you:

Walter Benjamin's Critique of Violence In 26 Words:

"Do we want to buy into democracy and the rule of law?"

"No, we do not want to buy into democracy and the rule of law."

- sparx [2010]

And now that we are all up to speed, here are some common assumptions about democracy and the rule of law:

1] justice is blind

2] the law applies to everyone equally

3] everyone is responsible for enforcing the rule of law

So, as I am not the first to point out, "democracy" is the internalisation of the rule of law, as can be seen by the paranoia about individuals who are thought to be breaking the law, such as individuals who use cannabis.

Basic Marxism states that the ideology of the ruling class becomes the ideology of the people, whereby the ruling class establish a law against the use of cannabis and the people obey the law against the use of cannabis. And people like Noam Chompsky and [far less boringly] Robert Anton Wilson take it further and say that the ideology of the ruling class becomes the reality of the people. RA Wilson uses cannabis as an example:

His words came through muffled. "It isn't only political power that grows out of the barrel of a gun. So does a whole particular definition of reality. A set and the action that has to happen on that particular set and on no other."

"Don't be so bloody patronising," I objected, looking around a corner in time and realising this was the night I would be maced. "That's just Marx: the ideology of the ruling class becomes the ideology of the whole society."

"Not just the ideology, the reality." He lowered his handkerchief. "This was a public park until they changed the definition. Now the guns have changed the reality: it isn't a public park. There is more than one kind of magic."

"Just like the enclosure acts," I said hollowly. "One day the land belonged to the people, the next day it belonged to the landlords."

"And like the narcotics act," he added. "A hundred thousand harmless junkies became criminals overnight by act of congress in 1927. Ten years later, in 1937, all the potheads in the country became criminals overnight by act of congress. And they really were criminals when the papers were signed. The guns proved it. Walk away from those guns waving a joint and refuse to halt when they tell you to, their imagination will become your reality in a second."

- Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea; The Illuminatus! Trilogy; Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing 1975 [1998 reprint.]

So, I'm sure your asking yourself, what's this got to do with that goatsucking whorebot former Kingfisher County Judge Susie Pritchett Of Tulsa, Oklahoma and me? Let's see what this reputable, mainstream news source has to say about it.

Disinformation Sensitivity Workshop #2: Chains We All Can Believe In

I dare you, I fucking dare you [from this extremely safe distance] to imagine three people are imprisoned in a prison.

Wait, what? "Imprisoned in a prison?" Who's editing this shit? OK, let's make it a bar. With, like, all your favourite kinds of beer, and the good tequila, oh, and you know those wasabi pea things that are about 20% MSG? I love those things.

Right. As I was saying: I dare you, I fucking dare you [from this extremely safe distance] to imagine three people are imprisoned in a bar.

And imagine the interesting and poignant thing about this bar is that the door is wide open.

Now: imagine that one of these three people realises the door to this bar is wide open and tries to escape, but as soon as this happens, all kinds of alarms go off and all three people are gassed until they lose consciousness.

When they wake up one of these three people realises [again] that the door to this bar is wide open and tries [again] to escape. But as soon as this happens the other two people become afraid and argue with the first person, saying, basically: the last time someone tried to escape all kinds of alarms went off and all three of us were gassed until we lost consciousness and it was really socially awkward and got in the way of drinking.

And when the first person again tries to escape, the other two people beat this person up until they lose consciousness, and when this person wakes up they don't try to escape again, even though the door is still wide open.

Furthermore: imagine that one of these three people is then taken away and replaced with a new person. This new person realises that the door is wide open and tries to escape. No alarms go off and no one is gassed, but the original two people remember what happened the last time and become afraid. So they beat up this new person until they lose consciousness, and when this new person wakes up they don't try to escape again, even though the door is still wide open.

Imagine that one of these three people is then taken away and replaced with a new person, who realises the door is wide open and tries to escape, but the other two people, one of whom has never experienced the alarms or the gas, become afraid and prevent this attempted escape by beating up this new person until they lose consciousness.

Now: imagine that one of these three people is then taken away and replaced with a new person, who realises the door is wide open and tries to escape, but the other two people, neither of whom has ever experienced the alarms or the gas, become afraid and prevent this attempted escape by beating up this new person until they lose consciousness.

So here's where I'm going with this: none of these three people have ever had the experience of being gassed but each person will now try to prevent the others from escaping out that wide open door. 

Finally, imagine that one of these people is me and another one of these people is you.

And this, I contend [and still maintain], is predictive programming. 

NEVER TRUST A MAN IN A MASK: The Food Liberation Army and the Myth of McDonalds

DISCLAIMER: I HAVE A DREAM

I have a dream. Well, not so much a dream, really. More like one of those, what do you call the wakey-time dreams? Incredibly detailed and elaborate assassination fantasies? Right. So. I have a dream. In my dream I abseil from the top of a sky-scraper right through the front window of McDonalds. Ronald McDonald is there. Waiting. Waiting for me. I have a piano wire with me. I do what needs to be done.

Then I fly - slowly, majestically, like an eagle - back to the top of my sky-scraper. It's a nice dream.

I guess it's a little disturbing, but now I've shared it with you I feel much better. Also, I'm probably not the only one who has these thoughts - these ideas - am I?

[#i'mtheonlyonebraveenoughtosharethemonasweetnewblogcalledTotalDisinformationAwarenessthough.]

INTRODUCTION: ROCK'N'ROLL MCDONALDS

So as I was having a flashback to my detailed assassinate Ronald McDonald with piano wire fantasy [wait  what? I had  a flashback to a fantasy? WOW! SO WRONG!] I'm sure you can imagine my happy surprise when I found an article about a group in  Finland called The Food Liberation Army who have done just that. Let's see what this reputable, mainstream publication has to say about it:

Children look away now: Food campaigners carry out sick spoof threat to behead Ronald McDonald after taking statue as 'hostage' [Daily Mail online, February 12, 2011]

Campaigners for ethically produced food today carried out their threat to behead Ronald McDonald - in a sick publicity stunt that has been branded 'poor taste' by the restaurant chain. Members of a group calling themselves the 'Food Liberation Army' staged the beheading in a Helsinki art gallery, after sparking outrage last week by releasing an Al Qaeda-style spoof video in which they were seen holding a hooded Ronald McDonald hostage.

Who's smiling now, clown? Huh? Who's smiling no- wait, never mind.

Members of the group stole a Ronald McDonald statue from a Helsinki restaurant on January 31, posting their videoed demands on YouTube days later. Finnish police later recovered the statue and arrested two of the members. But the group had prepared their own version of the iconic fast food character, which was executed in a performance with a guillotine today. Artist Jani Leinonen was present at the event - unmasked this time as he posed for photographers with the disconnected head of Ronald.

Mr Leinonen is one of the two members of the group who was arrested earlier this week. In the original YouTube video, the group are seen in black balaclavas with Ronald in the foreground, wearing a hood. The spokesman threatens to execute the character if the fast food chain refuses to answer questions about how it produces its products. McDonalds told MailOnline after the footage was released that the stunt was 'in very poor taste'. It also denied the group's suggestion that it was attempting to hide details about its food quality and manufacturing processes.