Dr StrangeJab or: How I Learned to Love the Vax Pass

  At the moment in Australia we are seeing more and more bizarre logic, like that represented in this tweet, bandied around regarding the concept of vaccine passports and segregating the vaccinated away from the unvaccinated. 

Again if you’re an anti - vaxxer & want absolute freedom to do what you want from not wearing a mask to no vaccination, that’s your right. It’s also right of others to say “I cannot be safe around you so you cannot come into my pub, workplace, home etc.” Choices have consequences

— Kon Karapanagiotidis (@Kon__K) September 7, 2021

Its even more egregious when it is coming from individuals who work for human rights organisations like the ASRC who one would think would know better. However leaving aside the many human rights concerns about this current push let us just look at the utterly insane illogic of this mans statement. He claims “I, as a vaccinated person, can not be safe around you as an unvaccinated person”. This is a completely fallacious argument and makes zero sense.

It seems like people are trying to conflate some of the arguments that people were making last year in the masked vs. unmasked people debate. In that argument people were claiming that an unmasked person was a threat as they may leave droplets on surfaces that even a masked person may come into contact with at some point and make them sick. 

If they really believed masks worked however the masked person should have been afforded some level of protection from the unmasked person but there was still logically an avenue of infection transmission that may arise from an unmasked person. Hence the unmasked person is branded a ‘threat’.

This argument completely breaks down however when one moves to vaccination. If one believes the vaccines work then a vaccinated person is completely safe around an unvaccinated person as they have immunity to the disease. Indeed this is why in a vaccine roll out we roll out the vaccine to health care workers first, so they are protected from the ill unvaccinated people they are still treating in the early stages of a vaccine roll out. 

If you are vaccinated then an unvaccinated person is absolutely no risk to you. Indeed that is the entire point to the vaccination to begin with. So why is there a rush to make out that unvaccinated people are some sort of plague carrying unclean caste in society? It is extremely bizarre.

Even if you want to argue that, as is definitely the case with this generation of vaccines, the vaccines themselves do not offer full protection from being able to catch the virus, this still does not make an unvaccinated person an increased risk to you as a vaccinated person. If you believe that the vaccine vastly lowers your risk of severe illness and death, then it is similarly completely safe to be around an unvaccinated person if you are vaccinated. If you do not believe the vaccine offers any such protection then what is the point to the vaccine at all? 

If the vaccine has given you a much better chance to metabolise the disease then in fact it may even be a good thing to be exposed to the disease whilst your vaccination immunity is at its highest. This will be like receiving a free booster shot from the unvaccinated person and after having had your bout with the illness, you will have an even more robust and longer lasting immunity to the disease. 

Indeed in this scenario you as the vaccinated person are a far bigger risk and danger to the unvaccinated person. For if the unvaccinated person were to catch the disease from you as a vaccinated carrier then they have the normal statistical risk of severe disease and death that the disease comes with, whereas you will be able to risk the virus and have the benefits of surviving illness with your vaccine enhanced immunity. So again the question remains what is the point of pretending Vaccinated people are some sort of holier than though caste in society compared with the unvaccinated?

It seems like they are once again conflating another argument in this case. There is an argument that has been used to keep unvaccinated children out of schools and childcare establishments. That argument goes that because in school there are young children who are too young to receive their vaccines yet but they have every intention to when they reach the correct age, that it is unfair to them if an older child who is unvaccinated by choice spreads a disease to them before they have had the opportunity to vaccinate themselves against it. Therefore these older unvaccinated children should be excluded. 

The moral reasoning behind this argument completely breaks down when we are talking about adult populations however. In an adult population if an adult has made the conscious choice not to get vaccinated then the risk is totally on them. If they get sick or die after catching the disease, either from a vaccinated person or another unvaccinated person, that is completely their choice and is no ones fault. Again in this scenario it is still the UNVACCINATED who are at risk not the vaccinated. The vaccinated do not need to be hiding behind castle walls viewing everyone else as a zombie in an utter panic like they currently are. 

About the only logical argument that the vaccinated could have with the unvaccinated is that they are concerned that so many unvaccinated people will get severe illness from the current pandemic that they will fill up all the hospital beds in the hospital system. Then if the vaccinated individual has a car crash, or some sort of health emergency, whilst going about their daily lives then they will not have a bed available to them for treatment to help them. However this is a very different proposition to the way the argument is being framed now, that the unvaccinated are a direct threat to your physical health just by walking into a room and saying hello to you as a vaccinated person. 

Indeed locking the unvaccinated out of your premises and businesses does absolutely nothing to address this issue. Unless you are advocating for euthanising all the unvaccinated, who knows at this point given the utterly unhinged rhetoric we are seeing on social media these days, then the unvaccinated will continue to circulate on the fringes of society, even if you have locked them out, and will have just as much risk of eventually coming into contact with the pathogen, getting sick and filling up those same hospital beds.  So the entire concept of the vaccination passport and the two-tier society yet again makes absolutely no sense from a disease control perspective.  

It seems that the whole thing is some cult like behaviour that has grown up in the pandemic as a combination of bad social media actors and fear of disease; such as we have seen in previous pandemics. Indeed people have started to treat vaccines like they are some black magic talisman in this pandemic and its like wearing garlic around the neck to ward off the evil of the unvaccinated vampires. Its amazingly stupid and illogical and anti science behaviour. 

It has been shocking to see how a nominally sensible country such as Australia has so rapidly devolved into a land of knuckle dragging, mouth breathing Primates who can barely string three coherent thoughts together anymore, in the face of this pandemic. It will be interesting to see if they can get their vaccine passports operational whether they will take the next logical step and begin disemboweling cats to read their entrails and burning witches in the town square.

(Australians attending a daily pandemic briefing)

Greta Thunberg Jumps The Shark

More and more often we are seeing the large corporate social influencer “activists” becoming completely incoherent in their positions on social media. A great case in point is the recent debacle with Greta Thunberg. Greta Thunberg has stirred controversy and protests against her across India in the past few days. This is due to her stated support of the farmers protest movement that is sweeping across the west of India.

The following article lays out the entire affair in great detail: As Fake As Her Tweets

It is interesting to note that yet again a large western social media ‘star’ is commenting on issues in a way that indicates she cannot do any deeper analysis on the cause she is supporting. A large portion of the farmers’ movement has been taken over by a conservative Sikh movement that seeks the independent religious homeland for the Sikhs in Khalistan, based along Punjabi ethnic separatism. 

This movement recently stormed the Red Fort in Delhi as part of their movement. This storming had very similar parallels in its intent, the reaction of the state and the reaction of the wider community in India as the earlier storming of the US capitol had in the United States.

 

Yet a quick purview of Greta Thunberg’s twitter shows a confusing mash of statements about these ideologies. Whilst Greta did not directly comment on the US Capitol event she did retweet this tweet, which indicates at least some support for the ideas contained within. Here the storming of the US capitol is portrayed as a violent event that was tantamount to an attempted coup.

At least 13 people were arrested today in connection to a violent mob that stormed the Capitol as part of an attempted coup.

138 @sunrisemvmt climate activists were arrested during a peaceful sit in of Nancy Pelosi’s office back in Dec 2018.

— Zahra Hirji (@Zhirji28) January 7, 2021

Yet only a few weeks later Greta tweets out regarding the events in India declaring them a ‘peaceful protest’. 

I still #StandWithFarmers and support their peaceful protest.
No amount of hate, threats or violations of human rights will ever change that. #FarmersProtest

— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) February 4, 2021

This is a ridiculous take to have. The authors of this blog also support the farmers’ movement in India and indeed they support the right of Khalistan to have its self-determination if it wishes. In exactly the same way the Confederate States of America have a right to restore their self-determination if they wish. But we cannot pretend the events in Delhi were peaceful protests. In fact they were the textbook definition of a violent insurrection against the Government. 

Once again we must wonder why western activists are continually pushing a double standard in their perspective on world events. Armed insurrections against sitting governments are perfectly appropriate abroad. Indeed they are considered a human right and much time and effort is put into arming and financially supporting many of these movements. Yet any armed insurrection at home is considered some terrible event that should never be allowed. 

This is a complete continuation of the colonialist mindset. Good ‘western white’ countries never have armed uprisings. Dirty ‘third world brown skinned countries’ are allowed to have coups as their standard operating procedure. Activists have to break this pattern of thinking if we are to hope to have any coherence going forward. All credibility in the activist left is being destroyed currently by this mindset and this action.

We also see Greta has gone even further down this line of reasoning, recently retweeting out support for the protests in Russia in support of Alexei Navalny.

Sometimes I have feeling that we live in occupied territories. Half of city center was "closed down".One man set himself on fire!
More than 4000 people were detained.I don't know what will happen next, but there are lot of us, we are tired of putting up with all this #FreeNavalny pic.twitter.com/OJFTnxK3bF

— Arshak Makichyan (@MakichyanA) January 31, 2021

Again the authors of this blog completely support the right of the citizens of the Far East and Siberian regions of Russia to secede. However that is not what the Navalny movement seeks to do. It is yet again another colour revolution being run by the Western Oligarchy in an attempt to replace Putin with a western backed puppet. In this case Navalny is everything these same groups were claiming for four years that Donald Trump was.  He is a formerly wealthy Russian who campaigned for the “Stop Feeding the Caucasus” campaign and even openly supported the idea that Muslim Caucasians from Chechnya and Dagestan were akin to Cockroaches who should be killed. He is literally a White Supremacist in the Russian context. 

One can imagine a Navalny Presidency in Moscow building a giant wall along the southern borders of Rostov Oblast. Yet here is the darling of the Western Left, Greta, openly supporting his movement.

It is hard to tell if in the social media world it is just too easy to rush into whatever the latest trend is, or if indeed these accounts are being controlled by very strategic, psychological warfare officers of the NATO Empire. Either way, if the left wants to restore any credibility in itself and stop haemorrhaging support to the nascent, so called, Alt  - Right it needs to stop being so ridiculously over the top with its hypocrisy. Greta’s popularity in the third world has taken a massive hit this week as a result of this nonsense. The rest of the Western left would be wise to learn from these mistakes and start thinking more deeply about what they actually ideologically support.

This problem is not just present in the Left either. We have seen recently Rudy Giuliani advocating for an investigation into what is clearly very real election fraud, perpetrated by the Democratic Party in America. Yet he couches it in terms that it is some sort of Communistic plot from the Democrats and lauds himself as a staunch anti Communist campaigner, resisting the fraud. 

Yet this narrative completely ignores the fact that the Democrats clearly do not have anything remotely resembling Marxism in their economic policies. It also fails to explain why such an anti-communist has spent the past five years exuberantly attending all sorts of rallies hosted by the People’s Mujahideen Organisation of Iran, or MEK, a self professed Marxist militia from Iran.  This organisation still maintains the Socialist star and the sickle symbol in its flag. Again this is hypocrisy bordering on black comedy.

Modern politicians, of all sides, current propensity to not stay true to their professed ideologies and to just go with whoever pays them the most is causing an increasing era of instability. We must find a way to restore some semblance of ideological coherence, if we want to once again be able to make actual and sensible changes for the current world system going forward. Simply following hack rhetorical movements from social media is not going to get us there. Greta has lost huge amounts of credibility in the past month with her social media footprint.

The ability to do a tiny amount of background checking on issues that one follows on Social Media should surely not be too hard for many to begin doing, before they just herd into movements they think they support blindly. Indeed it has been this dynamic that has caused so many to go along with the hugely damaging herd thinking around the lockdowns and the Covid pandemic and this instance with Greta is a great example of how this current social dynamic is working.

Hypocrisy of the United States Corporate Left

 It's amazing the massive hypocrisy of the new Woke Washing Faux Left that we have seen take over political discourse in the United States and by extension Britain and the remaining English speaking colonies such as Canada and Australia. 

When a bunch of hungry, religiously conservative, rural separatists stormed a Government building in America a few weeks back the entire global media sphere went into meltdown bleating about it.

Scenes from DC right now. They’ve raised the confederate flag outside the Capitol. pic.twitter.com/MAVv4a6DSA

— Rebecca Tan (@rebtanhs) January 6, 2021

Yet when a bunch of hungry, religiously conservative,  rural separatists stormed a Government building in India a few days ago the same bleating media class literally said nothing. NOTHING. Nothing for it or against it. They literally didn't mention it at all as if India does not count. 

It's becoming more and more clear that the Western Left ARE actually the Colonialist force they pretend they are trying to decolonise the world from. In a decolonised world there are no 'First World' and 'Third World' issues. There are only universal issues. So to pretend that only things in the 'First World' count is exactly the sort of colonial thinking we are supposed to be stamping out on the left and yet the Corporate Faux Left hegemony is doing everything but that. All it is doing is Woke Washing the same imperial colonial system in the hopes that it can buy another decade or so for that system to survive. 

For those who truly want some lasting and fundamental change in the world they are going to have to reform this way of thinking and viewing the world in themselves as a first step on this path. 

If scenes such as this are acceptable in Washington DC: 

Then so too are scenes such as this: 

In a further irony we saw recently in Washington DC Black Lives Matter protestors do this to the Ghandi statue in DC: 

This was followed up a few months later by the DC division of the Khalistan movement following in kind:

It seems that the far left and the far right can agree on some things at least.